Monday, June 20, 2011

#96 (2007): Do the Right Thing

M: Ugh. Overdone, exaggerated film that ostensibly focuses on the outcry of the black community stuck in the struggle of racial judgment. I’m sure there was a message in this movie somewhere but was lost in manic dialogue, no flow in the storyline, and wildly overemphasized characters. The opening credits alone, with Rosie Perez angrily gyrating to a purpose unknown to me and unrelated to the movie, makes me hate this movie. Every one of Lee’s films I’ve seen all have this same, overwrought, unrealistic feel with the exception of Malcolm X, only because that was a true story and [fortunately] not from the mind of Lee. Spike Lee needs to take copious notes from John Singleton’s Boyz in the Hood, a powerful film about racial struggles.

M's Rating:






J: I enjoyed this Spike Lee joint a lot more than my movie-watching buddy up there. It was really funny, at least in the beginning. The characters had fun names like Radio Raheem and Coconut Sid. Also, it was an all-star cast of, "hey, that's so-and-so from [insert show here]", like Gus from Breaking Bad,Commissioner Burrell from The Wire, Martin from Martin, and Ossie Davis from everything. When it turns into a drama at the end, it really makes you think. Or, at least, it really made me think. Neither Radio Raheem nor Sal got what they deserved, and the cops definitely didn't do the right thing (zing!), but what about everyone else? I don't know. Plus, I'm sure my race influences my opinion. Anyway, I'd watch this again. It was quirky and weird and thought-provoking.

J's rating:





IMDB

Wikipedia

#96 (1998): The Searchers

M: Didn’t care for it. I’m already not a fan of John Wayne, but piled on top of that is a long movie that gives no clear timeline of events. The film moves as if days or months are passing and it turns out to be years. Wayne plays a Civil War veteran (the confederate side…how’d that work out?). After a run-in with Indians, his niece is taken captive and Wayne takes on the long pursuit of rescuing her, his general hatred of Indians growing in the process.

M's rating:






J: Boooooooooooo! I had to watch this movie in college and I hated it. Maybe I'd like it more a decade later? As it turns out, no, no I would not. So far, the only movies we've watched that I've disliked have been Westerns. I'm not completely Western-averse. I liked the new True Grit. I remember enjoying The Quick and the Dead, but that was at the height of my DiCaprio-mania; I'm pretty sure that's actually a terrible movie. Anyway, I don't like this movie even a little bit. At least Charlie was a source of amusement, but I'm not sure if he was supposed to be slow. The only good thing about a second viewing of this movie is that at least this time I didn't have to write an essay about it. John Ford owes me four hours of my life back!

J's rating:






IMDB

Wikipedia

#97 (2007): Blade Runner

Note: We actually watched this movie last year, but we're a little late on posting.

M: This is a classic film for me I’ve seen a dozen times. A futuristic L.A. overrun by industry. Blade Runners are the cops of artificial life forms called Replicants created to work in off-world colonies. When those replicants go rogue, Blade Runners are called in to “retire” the them. A Band of replicants escape with the intent to find their creator and get more life, because they are created with a 4-year lifespan and their time is running out. Deckard (Harrison Ford) is a Blade Runner forced out of retirement to track down the escaped replicants and retire them, but finds conflict when he acquires an unlikely love interest.

M's rating:





J: I thought this was going to be a fun action-adventure type Indiana Jones or Star Wars, but it was more sci-fi drama. Not really my thing, but I do like movies that take place in some kind of dystopian future. Of all the movies we've watched so far, it was probably my second-least favorite (after Unforgiven). Also, I wish I had done this write-up earlier so I had more to say about the movie. I guess it was just okay for me. We need a third mask, Comedy, Tragedy, Indifference. This would get an Indifference mask. But since I didn't spend the entire time wishing it would end, I'll put it on the positive side.

J's rating:





IMDB

Wikipedia

Friday, August 13, 2010

#97 (1998): Bringing Up Baby

M: I've always known about Cary Grant and how he is a legend in the industry, and then of course there's his signature voice. But I never saw one of his movies. Also, I never knew he did comedy. Baby was a funny movie, with a brand of well-timed, witty humor you don't see much today. I loved the quick-paced banter between Grant and Hepburn. I'd watch this one again.

M's rating:






J: I think I've mentioned before that I don't know much about the great actors from the "golden age" of Hollywood. All of those tall, dark, and handsome types are the same to me. Except Clark Gable, because he had those ears. And a mustache. Anyway, I had never seen a Gary Cooper Cary Grant film before so I didn't know what to expect. I have to tell you: the accent pulled me right out of the movie at first. That whole Trans-Atlantic, not-quite-British-but-not-quite-American thing is WEIRD. To someone with little exposure to it (outside of maybe Madonna and some SNL parodies), I had some trouble taking him seriously at first, because I thought it was a joke. M assured me it was not, that is how people talked back then. (I guess he would know because he was there because he is a hundred years old.) (He is not actually 100 years old, just far more cultured than I am. I grew up watching the WWF. What do you want from me?) But I eventually got used to the weird accents and this movie was a lot of fun. Katharine Hepburn played a nutjob disaster who leaves a trail of destruction behind her wherever she goes and Gary Cooper Cary Grant played a flustered scientist/victim of KH's insanity. I laughed a lot and there was an adorbs leopard named Baby who, sadly, is probably dead because I looked it up and leopards only live to be about 25. In conclusion: I liked this movie.

J's rating:





IMDB
Wikipedia

We're Back!

After devoting about 2 months to nothing but Lost (amazing show!), and another month or so to this year's Oscar-nominated films (except Avatar, blech), and then training for a half marathon (which is in THREE WEEKS!), we are back "at the movies". Many of the next few movies on the list are either on Netflix Instant View or we own them, so we should be moving through them pretty quickly. Stay tuned!

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Note

M and I (well, mostly I and he was nice enough to jump on board) decided that we wanted to jump on the Lost train even though we've never seen an episode. So we have five seasons to catch up on before we watch the final season, which starts next month. That paired with Oscar season (in which we'll see as many nominated movies as we can) means that this project will probably be on hold until after the Oscars. But we will be back!

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

#98: Unforgiven

M: This movie did not disappoint when it comes to Eastwood and Westerns. It was gritty, an homage to such greats as High Plains Drifter. This also had a nice little ensemble of actors, with Gene Hackman as the man you love to hate, with such a love for peace that he doles out a great deal of violence to keep it. Morgan Freeman was ever-likable, even when he was trying to be bad. If you liked the Eastwood spaghetti westerns, this one shouldn't disappoint.

M's rating:






J: SNOOZE. Westerns aren't my thing so I didn't think I'd like this one. I was right. It wasn't a bad movie, but I spent a lot of time looking at the clock. It dragged. And the kid was crazy annoying. My favorite line: "Nobody's gonna pay good money for a cut-up whore". I want that on my tombstone.

Note from the future: This entry is posting in September 2010, even though it's under the date that the draft was written, December 2009. Re-reading this short review 9 months later, I realize that I hardly remember anything about this movie. I think maybe Morgan Freeman was in it, but he's in lots of Eastwood movies, so I could just be assuming. He plays Nelson Mandela in this one, right? Also, I'm pretty sure that in my head I'm getting this movie confused with the parts of The Outlaw Josie Wales that I've seen. That movie is super long and luckily not on The List.

J's rating:





IMDB
Wikipedia

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

#99 (2007): Toy Story

M: What's not to love about this movie? Aside from the all-star cast projecting their voices through Pixar creations, the film itself was clever and entertaining. This is one of those you could watch a dozen times.

M's rating:






J: Dude! It's Toy Story!

J's rating:






IMDB
Wikipedia

#99 (1998): Guess Who's Coming to Dinner

M: Edgy, I'm sure, for it's time. I was enthralled to see how, back then, interracial coupling was such a sensitive topic--in the days when one was either "colored" or a "negro" rather than "black" or "African-American". It was great to see such powerhouses of acting together in a film, that being Hepburn, Tracy, and of course Poitier. A must-see movie.

M's rating:






J: I don't know much about older actors, but I know enough to understand that Spencer Tracy + Katharine Hepburn + Sidney Poitier is going to equal gold on film. I loved this movie, enough that I would watch it again and highly recommend it. It was interesting that these parents raised their daughter to be colorblind. That's not a side of things you often see in movies from the 60s and before.

J's rating:






IMDB
Wikipedia

#100: Yankee Doodle Dandy

M: This was a good film. I fond the songs and storyline entertaining, though the choppy segues of back-stories failed to explain some things. When I learned the movie was based on an actual person, I thought it even better. And, with most films of old, the acting was unwavering.

M's rating:






J: I had pretty low expectations for this movie because it is super old and black and white. And I made the mistake of looking at the running time: over two hours! But it didn't feel like it was that long. Could have done without the blackface, but other than that, it was very entertaining, the music was great, and hey! did you know it was based on a real guy?

J's rating:






IMDB
Wikipedia